Since their emergence within the Seventies, outlined contribution (DC) plans in the USA have developed. One notable change has been a shift in how they develop funding lineups for participant-directed DC plans. Plan sponsors are progressing from merely utilizing generally held funding beliefs to making a construction that deliberately considers the traits and desires of their distinctive group of contributors.

On this article, I define the method for creating such a construction from an asset class perspective. A key part to considerate DC plan funding design is crafting a diversified funding construction earlier than deciding on particular funding autos.

Regulatory Basis & Steerage for Funding Menu Construction

The Worker Retirement Earnings Safety Act of 1974 (ERISA) mandates that plan fiduciaries act prudently and diversify the plan’s investments to reduce the chance of enormous losses. By offering a larger diploma of asset class diversification, plan sponsors can allow extra alternatives for contributors who self-direct their retirement account to mitigate funding danger.

For DC plans topic to ERISA, there are a number of prescriptive necessities, together with a principles-based customary of care (obligation of loyalty and obligation of care) that plan fiduciaries should observe when constructing a plan’s funding construction. Even for plans not topic to ERISA, many plan sponsors think about the rules set forth beneath ERISA as finest observe and select to implement them.

Usually, ERISA part 404(c) supplies DC plan fiduciaries safety from the legal responsibility for participant funding decisions if they provide a minimal of three diversified funding choices that bear materially completely different danger and return traits, corresponding to fairness, mounted revenue, and money equivalents.

In observe, it’s fairly uncommon for an funding construction to be restricted to only three funding choices. It’s because many funding fiduciaries consider that providing a bigger, diversified alternative set is helpful for contributors. Beneath the Pension Safety Act of 2006, sure pre-diversified funding choices, corresponding to Goal Date Funds (TDFs), are thought-about certified default funding alternate options (QDIA), which supplies a protected harbor to mitigate fiduciary danger.

The US Division of Labor (DOL) supplies steering for the choice of TDFs in addition to periodic evaluations of continued suitability. The DOL steering is finest observe and plan sponsors ought to leverage it when evaluating TDF utilization of their plan’s funding construction. Plan sponsors ought to set up a structured course of that first identifies a TDF philosophy after which evaluations participant demographic information, together with retirees, to evaluation and finally choose an applicable TDF suite. The identical participant information evaluation can also be helpful when assessing a plan’s core funding construction.

Past ERISA necessities and elective protected harbor provisions, DC plans’ named funding fiduciaries and their 3(21) funding advisors and three(38) funding managers have wide-ranging funding construction flexibility if selections are made in the perfect curiosity of contributors and beneficiaries. Such flexibility permits for an array of appropriate funding choices, which might be overwhelming for plan sponsors.

Crafting a Strong Funding Construction

Whereas the variability of DC plan participant teams’ wants and traits precludes a set method of a “proper” or “fallacious” funding lineup design course of, plan sponsors ought to keep a prudent and documented choice course of to fulfill their fiduciary obligations beneath ERISA.

A complete design course of is multi-step, calls for engagement by a plan sponsor’s retirement plan committee, and is finest led by a certified retirement plan advisor who’s dedicated to facilitating committee conversations and making ready demographic and fund utilization evaluations, amongst different duties.

A Pattern Course of in Seven Steps

1. Determine a function & aims assertion

Determine the corporate’s philosophy in regards to the DC plan’s main function and aims. Pattern statements and their potential impression on funding construction:

Goal: It is vital that our DC plan replicate the corporate’s aim to advertise a tradition of “retirement surroundings.” This could manifest as: lengthy worker tenure, staff who generally retire from our firm, and retirees who discover it enticing to retain their DC plan accounts within the employer’s plan all through retirement.

Potential impression: The aim assertion may counsel that plan asset courses and TDFs help a retiree’s have to diversify mounted revenue allocations, as a result of mounted revenue sometimes turns into a bigger portion of an investor’s portfolio close to all through retirement.

Goal: It is vital that our DC plan additional the corporate’s aim of supporting staff as they save and make investments for retirement. We observe that our firm has an extended historical past of using largely early-career individuals, and based mostly on previous expertise, we anticipate excessive worker turnover that ends in few, if any, retirements from the corporate. When retirements happen, we observe that accounts are faraway from the DC plan shortly thereafter.

Potential impression: The aim assertion may advantage the inclusion of a number of fairness asset courses and core or core plus mounted revenue as a result of, for the non-TDF investor section, this design would offer for ample fairness diversification, whereas minimizing the necessity to allocate to separate mounted revenue sub-asset courses. It additionally may lend itself to a TDF designed for top fairness allocations early in its glide path and low-to-moderate fairness allocations (relative to the TDF universe common) close to the goal retirement age.

2. What % of contributors are enrolled in managed account providers and/or self-directed brokerage accounts?

Participant enrollment in a managed account service is usually low sufficient that it doesn’t affect the plan’s general funding construction, except for making certain the service’s minimal required asset courses are included. But when the managed account service serves because the plan’s QDIA, and retention within the QDIA is excessive, determine the asset courses the managed account supplier will use and never use. Carry out a cost-benefit evaluation of together with asset courses past these required by the managed service supplier.

3. Develop a participant group profile to know the plan’s buyers.

A DC plan’s participant group profile ought to be based mostly on demographics and investor sort. Since every plan’s participant group has various demographic traits, don’t depend on participant group averages for data corresponding to age, compensation, schooling stage, and firm tenure. Analyzing averages typically fails to replicate the breadth of a plan’s distinctive participant group, in addition to any concentrated segments that symbolize the most important variety of contributors.

When growing the participant group profile, consider what finest describes the largest variety of contributors. Plan sponsors might divide contributors into the next classes:

a. Investor sort

• The “do it for me” sort: Members who elect to put money into the QDIA; any fund with broad asset allocation, corresponding to goal danger or different asset allocation funds; or a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” sort: Members who elect to take a position largely in particular person asset class funds or a self-directed brokerage account.

If “do it for me” is the plan’s predominant investor sort, the funding construction might or might not have to include greater than the first asset courses relying on the profile of the “do it myself” buyers. For instance, if the “do it myself” buyers have a excessive stage of funding proficiency or are prone to have their very own private funding advisors, the funding construction could also be justifiably extra complete. Nevertheless, relying on the traits and variety of the “do it myself” buyers, advert hoc requests from contributors for particular sub-asset class choices and different funding autos could also be finest addressed by providing a self-directed brokerage possibility.

b. Demographic profile

• Determine the quantity and % of contributors by age vary and investor sort.
• Search for any prevalent age cohorts. Understanding the focus in every age cohort can sign consideration for particular wants.

c. Funding proficiency of non-QDIA buyers

• Rank the committee’s notion of participant funding proficiency as excessive, medium, or low. Funding proficiency might be estimated based mostly on how nicely the “do it myself” group makes use of non-QDIA asset courses. For instance, is there a sample of choosing few asset courses, and does the sample fluctuate by age cohort?
• It’s cheap to anticipate early-career contributors to make use of fewer asset courses. For this cohort, there may be prone to be a deal with equities over mounted revenue. It’s cheap to imagine the chosen variety of asset courses would enhance for mid- and late-career cohorts as a result of diversification and danger mitigation are likely to grow to be extra valued.
• One other strategy to observe funding proficiency is by utilizing a scatter plot of participant fairness/mounted revenue allocation splits by age, in comparison with a pattern TDF allocation. The plan’s recordkeeper ought to have the ability to present this data. If the scatter plot exhibits large dispersion from the pattern TDF allocation, it’s cheap to imagine funding proficiency is probably going low. A low diploma of funding proficiency can affect whether or not the funding construction designed for non-QDIA buyers might be streamlined by excluding non-core asset courses, corresponding to commodities.

d. Draw back danger tolerance

Utilizing the same low-medium-high score system, gauge draw back danger tolerance of the most important participant section. Draw back danger tolerance is a vital consider intentional funding construction design and QDIA choice.

To assist determine participant draw back danger tolerance, plan sponsors can:

• Evaluation recordkeeping stories of transfers into and out of funding choices throughout calendar quarters instantly following a market downturn or massive loss in a particular asset class.
• If the trade doesn’t require post-secondary schooling for many staff, draw back danger tolerance is comparatively low and most plan sponsors will eclude asset courses topic to extra frequent and important losses. Alternatively, if superior ranges of schooling are required, plan sponsors might wish to assume a average to excessive stage of draw back danger tolerance.

e. Stability of workforce

If turnover and liquidations by laid-off staff are excessive, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction and any TDFs provided ought to lean towards a low draw back danger profile.

f. Presence of an outlined profit pension plan

Along with the DC plan, does the corporate additionally sponsor an outlined profit pension plan that it intends to maintain lively with continued profit accruals? Does it present ample, focused substitute revenue to long-term staff? If sure, does the corporate view the DC plan as “supplemental”? On this occasion, it’s cheap to imagine that the funding construction of the DC plan could also be restricted to broad, core asset courses.

4. Evaluation the variety of asset class choices.

The variety of asset courses ought to be knowledgeable by the plan’s function and aims assertion and participant group profile, moderately than proactively setting an arbitrary restrict on the variety of asset courses. The latter motion might end in plan sponsors overlooking the perfect pursuits and desires of “do it myself” buyers. As the most well-liked QDIA, TDFs permit much less engaged contributors, or these with decrease funding proficiency, to keep away from confusion or challenges in making asset allocation selections.

The common variety of funding choices has declined as a result of contributors who’re much less comfy making knowledgeable funding selections now have larger entry to pre-diversified choices like TDFs or managed accounts. For reference, the common variety of funding choices (not asset courses) provided by plans is at the moment 21. The three highest ranges by respondents had been:

1. 1 to fifteen choices: 21.5%,
2. 16 to twenty choices: 26.2%
3. 26 or extra: 25.9% 

5. Keep away from difficult funding menu design.

If the participant group profile suggests a streamlined funding construction and variety of funding choices, preserve the next factors in thoughts.

• A number of funding choices in the identical asset courses: Provide just one possibility per asset class except the choices encompass an lively and passive implementation.
• World fairness and glued revenue: If the funding construction has separate home and worldwide asset courses, world asset courses might end in unintended overlap.
• Sector, regional, and country-specific asset courses, excluding actual property funding trusts (REITs): These asset courses have larger danger publicity attributable to their extra particular or concentrated nature and different areas of the funding construction additionally probably have publicity to them. Remember that this may occasionally result in overlap and unintentional, massive allocations to particular areas of the market.
• Single-commodity asset courses: If commodities are applicable for the plan’s funding construction, the diversification impact of together with a automobile with broad-based commodity publicity might assist mitigate the chance related to publicity to a single commodity, corresponding to gold, oil, or small teams of commodities like treasured metals.
• Goal danger: Goal danger funds, which keep a set or restricted vary of fairness versus mounted revenue, are liable to unintentional misuse by contributors who stay in the identical fund for longer than applicable, moderately than shifting to lower-risk, lower-equity allocation variations as their time horizons lower.
• Cash market and steady worth funds: Steady worth funds have traditionally outperformed cash market funds as a result of they’ll put money into intermediate-term bonds and keep principal safety by wrap insurance coverage. Together with each cash market and steady worth funds can complicate participant asset motion as a result of cash market funds are deemed “competing funds” to steady worth. Steady worth funds don’t allow direct transfers to competing funds corresponding to cash market or different low-duration mounted revenue funds.

6.  Evaluation historic efficiency previous to asset class choice.

Evaluation historic efficiency for the final 10 years of all asset courses thought-about for lineup inclusion to determine asset courses which can be too risky or topic to massive losses. This may assist the committee perceive their historic patterns and magnitude of beneficial properties and losses. Concentrate on the most important beneficial properties and largest losses for every asset class through the 10-year interval. Evaluation the usual deviation for five- and 10-year durations.

7. Replace the group’s funding coverage assertion to doc permissible asset courses.

Examine the DC plan’s Funding Coverage Assertion (IPS) to substantiate it expressly permits the specified asset courses. Amend the IPS, if wanted, earlier than making funding construction adjustments to the plan menu.

Placing the Participant Group Profile into Follow

Listed here are two potential eventualities and the ensuing pattern funding constructions:

Participant Group A:

• Plan function assertion: It is vital that our DC plan helps the corporate’s aim of making a “retirement surroundings” tradition that promotes lengthy tenure of employment with frequent retirements from our firm, and for retirees to search out it enticing to retain their plan accounts all through retirement.
• Plan at the moment presents a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” buyers symbolize 60% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is ages 50-80, and contributors have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
• Eighty % of retirees go away their account within the plan for the long run and take systematic withdrawals following retirement.
• The “do it for me” buyers symbolize 40% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is the 21-40-year vary, and contributors have a excessive stage of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Recommended asset courses:

• Home fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• • Mid cap: development, core, and worth
• • Small cap: development, core, and worth
• Worldwide fairness
  • Massive cap: development, core, and worth
• Mounted revenue
  • Treasury inflation-protected securities
• Worldwide mounted revenue
• Broad-based commodities
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Participant Group B:

• Plan function assertion: It is vital that our DC plan displays the corporate’s aim of making a tradition that helps staff as they save and make investments for retirement. Our group tends to make use of predominantly early profession individuals. We anticipate and have traditionally skilled excessive worker turnover that ends in few, if any, retirements. When retirements happen, accounts are faraway from the plan shortly thereafter.
• Plan doesn’t at the moment provide a managed account service.
• The “do it myself” buyers symbolize 20% of contributors. The biggest age cohort is 40-45 years, and contributors have a average stage of funding proficiency.
• Plan presents a self-directed brokerage possibility, utilized by roughly half of the “do it myself” buyers.
• The few contributors that stay within the plan previous age 65 have traditionally rolled over their accounts to particular person retirement accounts inside two years post-retirement.
• The “do it for me” buyers symbolize 80% of contributors and there aren’t any age cohorts with a materially increased focus than others. Members are assumed to have a low stage of funding proficiency.
• The workforce is steady and never topic to periodic layoffs based mostly on financial cycles.
• The corporate doesn’t present an outlined profit pension plan along with the DC plan.

Recommended asset courses:

• Home fairness
• Worldwide fairness
• Mounted revenue
• Worldwide mounted revenue
• Asset allocation (TDFs)

Empowering Plan Sponsors

Utilizing an knowledgeable, structured funding design course of will bolster DC plan sponsor confidence that funding lineup choice selections are tailor-made to the wants of most plan contributors. The funding menu design course of ought to allow the plan sponsor to really feel educated about how the group arrived at its plan’s funding construction and why, in addition to present the knowledge essential to doc a prudent decision-making course of, a key tenant of fiduciary obligation beneath ERISA.

In the event you favored this put up, don’t overlook to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Heart.

All posts are the opinion of the writer(s). As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

The fabric offered herein is of a common nature and doesn’t represent the availability by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The data contained herein was obtained from sources deemed dependable. Such data just isn’t assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The data contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.

PNC might present hyperlinks to different websites. Content material on such websites is offered solely for the person’s comfort. PNC makes no guarantee of any sort relating to that content material and linking to such content material doesn’t represent or point out sponsorship, endorsement or affiliation in any approach.

The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising identify PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the varied discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated providers offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax providers settlement. PNC Financial institution just isn’t registered as a municipal advisor beneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Road Reform and Shopper Safety Act.

“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Could Lose Worth.

©2024 The PNC Monetary Companies Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / Rudenkoi

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can document credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.